NYU Takes a Shave; Locals Still Not Pleased

East, Newsletter
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
.
The NYU expansion plan as seen from above will not change drastically. (Courtesy NYU)

The NYU expansion master plan as seen from above will not change drastically. (Courtesy NYU)

As was largely expected following comments from Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer‘s office leaked to the press last month, officials from NYU announced that the university has agreed to shave off 370,000 square feet from their 2,275,000 square foot expansion plan, The New York Times reported.

In a telephone interview with AN, Andrew Berman, of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, said that even with those changes the project is still out of scale for the neighborhood. Berman added that he was disappointed that the Borough President (BP) didn’t hold public meetings for the ULURP, as was done for the Columbia University expansion in Morningside Heights. “If there was ever a ULURP to hold a public hearing for, it was this,” he said.

A cross section of the north blocks Boomerang Building reveal the underground complex that the new plan leaves in tact. (Couresy NYU)

A cross section of the north blocks' Boomerang Buildings reveal the underground complex that the new plan leaves in tact. (Couresy NYU).

For the past few months, several NYU watchers have been speculating that the university was hedging its bets with a plan that included more space than needed so as to reach the Goldilocks-just-right moment negotiated by the BP’s office today. The breakdown doesn’t change the overall character of the design. The comparison of plan being the “size of the Empire State Building” still somewhat applies, though less 17 percent (NYU documents put it closer to minus 14%). The changes leave the underground complex on the north block fairly intact. The so-called Kimmelman Plan, which called for the elimination of the Grimshaw/Toshiko Mori Boomerang buildings, was ignored. Instead, the university proposes to take 85,000 square feet off the top, but the 770,000 square feet below grade will remain.

On the southern superblock the new plan proposes moving the Zipper Building farther back from Mercer Street, to allow more light for neighbors across the street. But the original plan, refined by Michael Van Valkenburg, would have in any case opened up a dreary alleyway between the Zipper Building and I.M. Pei’s Silver Towers, thus creating a more generous approach from Houston Street to the courtyard featuring Picasso’s sculpture Portrait of Sylvette. Finally, the proposed 14-story building set to replace the supermarket on the northwest corner will be cut in half.  Whether this makes much of a difference in the overall pedestrian influx is doubtful, as that building included a proposed public school that the Department of Education never agreed to use. A controversial hotel is still in the mix, for now.

The revised plan will be presented to City Planning today, but the big brouhaha public hearing will take place on April 25 at 10:00 A.M. Territorial ironies aside, the commission has wisely relocated the public meeting to the more spacious environs of the Museum of the American Indian at Bowling Green.

3 Responses to “NYU Takes a Shave; Locals Still Not Pleased”

  1. Russell Blount says:

    I just wonder how much damage they will do to existing FOUNDATIONS of the buildings in the neighborhood. NYU is offering things the community does not need, such as retail space, more traffic, more noise, less air quality. Hell, they are NYU and can get-away-with-it. .

  2. Sylvia says:

    Sexton isn’t clean shaven yet. NYU needs to shave the moustache and beard of its 2 million too many square feet from the 2031 ULURP and certainly 20 years of construction is a no go. Not only will existing foundations be damaged but the Minetta Creek which flows beneath the Washington Sq. Village complex will flood into other areas. Thoughtless people work with NYU.

  3. David says:

    NYU always knew that its expansive plan would be cut back a little in order to win brownie points for city officials. It’s all a game that the public is getting more and more aware of.

    This is a horrific plan that should not take place in the village. Period. NYU signed a 40-year agreement not to develop in this area and now they are breaking it. Period. NYU has not right to public land. Period

Post new comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (required)

Advertise on The Architect's Newspaper.

Submit your competitions for online listing.

Submit your events to AN's online calendar.




Archives

Categories

Copyright © 2014 | The Architect's Newspaper, LLC | AN Blog Admin Log in. The Architect's Newspaper LLC, 21 Murray Street 5th Floor | New York, New York 10007 | tel. 212.966.0630
Creative Commons License